Fruitcakes and Novels

Fruitcake

 

My high school band sold fruitcakes to raise money for band trips. We went door to door in our neighborhood (wearing our band uniforms on a Saturday morning) extolling the merits of those creations from the south Georgia pecan belt. I hated every minute of it.

 

 

 

Tender-Shadows-Cover-200x300

 

 

Now the publisher of my novels has gifted me with a promotion (a priceless gem these days when most books are self-promoted). Friday, June 13, the first day of the promotion, you can buy the Kindle edition of my latest novel, Tender Shadows, for $1.99. The next day, Saturday, June 14, Tender Shadows sells for $2.99. Sunday, June 15, the price is $3.99. Then it goes back to the still reasonable price of $4.99.

Buy from Amazon.com

 

I’m trying, am I not? But I still cringe when faced with marketing. Marketing asks people to give up something, usually money, but also time, perhaps even more precious.

Why would someone choose to expend these precious commodities to read my novels or write reviews of them or even read my blogs? Given the new world created by the internet, novels proliferate like eighteenth century political tracts. Blogs are as prevalent as misty droplets in a Seattle winter.

Nevertheless, unless you are as famous as Stephen King, you do it. Authors write. Authors sell.

One thing in my favor: I don’t like fruitcake, but I love to read. And write.

How Hope Overwhelms the Shootings at Seattle Pacific University

Which of us hasn’t sorrowed at the school shootings which seem to happen regularly these days? The one at Seattle Pacific University two days ago, however, especially affected me.

Seattle is the closest major city to my home. More than that, I’ve attended a writers’ conference there. I receive SPU’s Response magazine each quarter in the mail. I’ve quoted from it in this blog. I know at least one writer on the staff there. Each week, a guided Bible reading from the school arrives in my inbox that I use in my daily devotions.

SPU is affiliated with the Free Methodist denomination. The college lays great stress on the connection between faith and service in the wider world.

According to news reports, a lone gunman entered a building on campus and killed one person and seriously wounded two others. Another student is credited with saving more individuals from harm by attacking the gunman with pepper spray and disarming him.

What stands out for me in this tragic episode is not only the heroism of the student who dared confront the gunman. Even more significant for me are the images of hundreds of students from the university sitting afterwards in circles on the SPU campus holding hands and praying. They comforted each other in huddles. They gathered together for prayer in a nearby church.

I’m sure every student at SPU at this time will live forever influenced by this event. However, those students reacting to tragedy by coming together in spiritual community send a stronger message. They convince me that a force stronger than evil is loose in this world and will ultimately prevail.

Dealing with Bodily Fluids, or How I Learned To Speed Read

 

I suppose it’s healthier that we reflect our angst in our literature rather than repressing it and pretending all is well. I’m not sure about all of the trends, though. Our plunge into pessimism is mirrored by a plunge into the four-letter morass of bodily excretion in all its forms. Words that appeared in mainstream writing only for a bit of spice are now as common as allergies in the spring.

Along with the old four letter words, casual sex proliferates. In our work-a-day world, such casual sex now is common, along with obesity, possibly not a coincidence. Ours is not an age known for self-discipline.

I began reading one of our postmodern novels for a book club and found myself skimming along, just to understand enough of the plot for discussion. It wasn’t just the language. The protagonists were about as attractive as piranhas, mirroring, I suppose, our disillusion with cardboard heroes and heroines. Surely, fiction can be realistic without deleting all hope?

What came at me was not so much the words as the anger. I don’t mean anger at obvious wrong. This anger seemed to come from lack of purpose.

Maybe that’s the foundation for much of our current writing: unresolved anger. We are geared to find purpose and meaning. When we find that the objects we pursue only for pleasure turn out to be meaningless, anger overwhelms us.

What Is This Place Named Tiananmen Square?

 

Tiananmen Square 1989 One million protestersYou may see the term “Tiananmen Square” frequently in the news this next week. A quarter century ago, a movement in that square in Beijing, China, for more democracy, was crushed by authorities in June, 1989. Hundreds of students are estimated to have been killed, perhaps more.

The watershed year 1989, however, was not over. In the autumn, countries in eastern Europe, starting with Poland, erupted with “democracy fever,” leading to their departure from the Soviet Union. Before the year ended, tentative beginnings toward democratic governments in these countries stumbled forward.

Tiananmen Square 1989 Military assaultSpring, 1989, had seen the movement in China smothered by the military. However, in November of that same year, the barrier between East and West Germany in Berlin—”the Wall”—fell.

More recently, Arab movements toward more inclusive governments appear to have birthed more failures than successes. And what about Ukraine?

The story continues to write itself—successes and failures—but it’s not over. We wait for more chapters. In the meantime, read a moving story from an American who was in Tiananmen Square at the time.

Where the Spoils System Is Alive and Well

 

Years ago the comic strip Doonesbury ran a segment lampooning the political appointment of U.S. ambassadors. In the storyline, government officials of an unnamed country strive to maintain secret connections with a lower level American diplomat. They seek to bypass the appointed ambassador, a know-nothing doofus named because he gave money to a political campaign.

One might expect corrupt dictatorships to send politically connected hacks to serve as ambassadors. But do we want to imitate them?

Map of NATO countriesHow about our democratic allies? What kind of people do these countries appoint as ambassadors TO the United States? According to a recent study of ambassadors from NATO countries (May 2014 issue of The Foreign Service Journal), not a single one serving at the time was politically appointed.

Peter Bridges, a retired career ambassador, wrote in a recent article on the Internet: “In all of our republic’s history, only one career Foreign Service officer has ever been our ambassador to the United Kingdom—our most important ally. . . . In contrast, the British almost invariably send one of their most experienced career diplomats to Washington.”

On average, around one third of U.S. ambassadors are appointed for political reasons, usually because they give money to political campaigns. Democratic and Republican presidents are equally guilty in the appointment of favorites instead of career Foreign Service officers who’ve spent years serving in countries all over the world and learning how to deal with foreign governments.

We don’t appoint generals because they give money to a political party. Even in corporations, where money matters a great deal, managers usually are chosen for their skills. Why should it be different for ambassadors?

Of course, political ambassadors are generally not appointed to dangerous countries like Libya, where career ambassador Chris Stevens was murdered by terrorists.

Tender Shadows: Risking Community in a World Falling Apart

 

As in most of my writing, I don’t know how Tender Shadows began. Writing for me is a bit like breathing, I just do it.

I seem to remember questioning our throw-away society: how we throw away more than plastic bottles and last year’s iPads. Politicians ride a crest of popularity, then fade. Celebrities become our idols until some scandal does them in. Sometimes we throw away families.

Tender Shadows CoverThe characters in Tender Shadows differ in background and purpose and choices. They mirror society in the early twenty-first century. They include the digitally adept and the digitally challenged, the athletic and those who struggle to keep off extra pounds, the confident and the searchers.

Beth, staring at middle age in a few years time, hopes to grab what she can from a life first of loss and then of aimless wandering. Joe, widowed, doesn’t want any other woman competing with memories of his beloved wife. Joe’s daughter, Annie, recovers from a past mistake—only was it a mistake? David, a young Palestinian-American, ignores his growing affection for Annie because he’s not worthy of tenderness after what he did in Iraq.

Thrown together at a U.S. embassy in what is supposed to be a peaceful assignment in a country friendly to the United States, they creep toward community. They share but constantly bump up against barriers which impede that sharing.

They watch increasing signs that not all citizens of this prosperous Gulf nation are pleased with their young ruler’s American ideas. Many fear the erosion of traditional values. The Americans wonder how threatened are their own values.

What Happens After the Next Sale at the Mall?

 

Walter Russell Mead, a professor at Bard College, writing in Foreign Affairs (May/June 2014) suggests that Americans and Europeans risk losing all that they have gained after the end of the Cold War. They are, he says, becoming “a narcissistic consumer with no greater aspirations beyond the next trip to the mall.” They are “unwilling to make sacrifices, focused on the short term, easily distracted, and lacking in courage.”

What happened to our victorious march to democracy in every corner of the globe?

Boris Yeltsin on tankFlying in a small plane over one of Saudi Arabia’s deserts in 1991, I read of the first attempt of the old Russian guard to bring back Soviet Russia after Gorbachev’s pivot toward the West. Boris Yeltsin, showing courage he lacked later in bringing true democracy to his country, stared them down and won the day. Russia appeared once more set on the road to what we call Western liberalism.

But something has happened on the way to the glorious finale of Soviet communism’s demise, of the Arab spring, and of nations on every populated continent accepting democratic ideals.

Every blessing, every progression seems to host a two-edged sword. The digital revolution has made neighbors of us all. It has revolutionized everything from medicine to street protests to Wall Street, yet we seem to have lost our ability to live for more than ourselves.

Is there hope? Probably not in the places of usual power—governments and corporations. If rescue comes, it will probably come in the guise of small communities of people deliberately deciding to live intentionally instead of grabbing for the most toys before dying.

How Do We React to Loss of Control?

We fear loss of control. We fear finding ourselves at the mercy of another person or of events “out of our control.” Suppose we experience a sudden accident, lose our job or our house in a recession, or suffer from an act of terrorism?

Perhaps wisdom begins with the possibility of failure. We can work for a certain end, for job advancement, for our candidate in a political race. We will not always win, or we may be disappointed when we do win and find it isn’t as rewarding as we thought it would be.

We may pray with Saint Augustine to change the things we can but accept the things we cannot. We relinquish, little by little, the idea that we are God.

Mans Search for MeaningWhen circumstances beyond our control and not of our making place us in bad, even horrible situations, we can remember the lessons of Viktor Frankl. Imprisoned in a German concentration camp, at the mercy of those who hated his race, Frankl continued to develop his inner thoughts and ideas. After release from the camp, Frankl expressed those ideas in a book read by millions, Man’s Search for Meaning.

We may not be able to control what happens to us, he said, but we have a choice as to how we react to those circumstances.

 

Why You Should Avoid Attack Ads, Slogans, and Sound Bytes

 

Attack ads, slogans, and sound bytes harm because they obscure. Climate change, cyber warfare, and economic recessions cannot be explained in a few words. Conflicts in Syria and Ukraine pit al-Qaeda and different ethnic groups into an alphabet of amorphous foes. They require a more intelligent probing than is found in a few celebrity-studded newscasts.

The new world order requires a citizenry that thinks.

SwastikaThe Nazis came to power in Germany in a society of educated, middle class citizens. An unsuccessful war and economic problems led a significant proportion of the population to look for simple solutions like blaming Jews. Instead they might have examined issues like the world wide recession and its effects on Germany. They might have found a way to deal with the heavy debt placed on the country by the treaty that ended World War I. Instead, they allowed themselves to be caught in the hyper nationalism championed by the Nazis.

Start thinking with this article. Based on a study, it asks if the United States can still claim to be a democracy.

Like It or Not, We’re Americans. What Do We Do With It?

 

“. . . whether or not we want to care about the freedom of others, we are expected to. I’ve never been to a refugee camp or bombed out city or political prisoner’s home where people told me: ‘Why isn’t Brazil helping us,’ or ‘We’re angry at Russia and China.’ Because of who we are, how we see ourselves, and the power we project, it’s always us people look to. You can see that as a burden. I see it as our greatest strength, a quality that distinguishes us from every global power that has come and gone in history. It’s also an opportunity.”

—Remarks by Tom Malinowski (Assistant Secretary; Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor at the State Department; from his speech “Human Rights and National Security: A Value-Based Foreign Policy”)

“What Would America Fight For?” The Economist asked in its May 3rd, 2014, issue. The question appeared against a backdrop of the latest crisis, how to respond to Russia’s Putin as he unilaterally grabs chunks of other countries, most recently Ukraine. The Economist remarked: “American power is not half as scary as its absence would be.”

world mapAmerica, whether we like it or not, became the country that other countries expect to fix things. It is, as Mr. Malinowski said, an opportunity to do good. The problem is that power is easy to abuse.

Why was it, we ask now, that we got involved in Iraq? Something about weapons of mass destruction? Which, after lives were lost and treasure wasted, turned out to be a myth.

A knee-jerk military reaction to the world’s problems is foolish. The opposite response, to suppose that we have no reason to become involved with problems far from our shores, is equally tragic. Such a response, after we turned inward following World I, was rudely shattered by Pearl Harbor. And the terrorism that began on September 11, 2001, surprised us, in part, because we ignored festering problems when we won the Cold War.

Foreign policy, unfortunately, has become politicized. Better to act on a quote attributed to Senator Arthur Vandenberg at the start of the Cold War: “Partisan politics should stop at the water’s edge.”

 

Do We Practice Our Religion Or Merely Own It?

 

I read with interest a recent column by Ross Douthat in The New York Times. Apparently practicing Christians have less divorces and out-of-wedlock births than the unaffiliated. Nominal Christians, however, (they call themselves Christians but don’t attend church much) have higher rates of both than non-believers.

Douthat states: “The social goods associated with faith flow almost exclusively from religious participation, not from affiliation or nominal belief. And where practice ceases or diminishes . . . the remaining residue of religion can be socially damaging instead.”

I was taken with his idea that support networks are important for the practicing of faith. Faithfulness to beliefs and corresponding behavior will more likely succeed if one shares it with a support network. That is the reason for groups as diverse as Alcoholics Anonymous and Weight Watchers.

We value the rugged individual, yet a shared journey is more likely to be successful.

Read the column for Douthat’s full treatment of the subject.

My Conversion from Cookie-Cutter Christianity

 

When I was a child in Nashville, Tennessee, our public schools were integrated by court order. Bitter opposition followed. One school was burned down. Some Christians said God didn’t mean for blacks and whites to mingle together.

The others 2This period was a beginning, not of leaving my faith, but of finding a more mature faith. Before in my world, Christians were Christians, and the rest was everybody else. Now I began to see graduations within the Christian community as well as in the community of “others.” I found that I could disagree but respect those who differed with me. I am, as the apostle Paul said, still working out my own salvation with fear and trembling.

The OthersI also came to understand that some people who called themselves Christians have committed grievous sins against others. We worship Jesus who, though equal with God, humbled himself to become like us. Yet, in our arrogance, we scream at the different others as though we are God and know perfection. Now I am more aware of my own potential for error and am more willing to listen to other viewpoints.

Love Never FailsI find no fault in Jesus, but I fear that we have clung, not to Jesus and his radical love, but to something less, Christianity as a mere civil religion. Perhaps that is why Christianity is no longer the default religion in the Western world.

Why Haven’t We Killed Osama bin Laden’s Dream?

 

The May 7th 2011 issue of The Economist featured Osama bin Laden on its cover with the caption “Now, kill his dream.” The al-Qaeda instigator of the 9/ll attacks had been killed by U.S. Navy seals the week before.

The_Economist_2011-05-07_Bin LadenBin Laden is dead, but his influence lives on, directly or indirectly, in numerous bloody attacks since then: in Nigeria, in Boston, in London, in Syria, and a dozen other places.

An article in the magazine outlined bin Laden’s dream. He wished to purge present day Islam of its “corruptions” and “secular influences.” He concluded that taking lives of innocent men, women, and children in that cause was justified. Unfortunately, lives still are being lost in brutal efforts to fulfil bin Laden’s dream.

According to a State Department report on terrorism, released this week, “core” al-Qaeda is much reduced in ability. However, local al-Qaeda groups, such as Boko Haram in Nigeria, have increased in strength. Boko Haram recently was in the news for kidnaping 230 girls from a school.

Kill his dream, but how?

By acting out dreams of our own that prove stronger. Forgiveness instead of hate. Seeking the good of others instead of idle pursuit of pleasure. Integrity instead of corruption.

Why Democracy?

 

“I believe in political equality. But there are two opposite reasons for being a democrat. You may think all men so good that they deserve a share in the government of the commonwealth, and so wise that the commonwealth needs their advice. That is, in my opinion, the false, romantic doctrine of democracy. On the other hand, you may believe fallen men to be so wicked that not one of them can be trusted with any irresponsible power over his fellows.”

—C.S. Lewis, Present Concerns

Democracy quoteWealth, a form of power, triumphs over the common good unless laws prevent it. The wealthy are no more evil than the rest of us, but wealth tempts any of us who have it, as all power does.

When every citizen can vote, one group’s desire to dominate can be checked by those not in the group. Democratic forms of government tend to restrain our selfish tendency to grab power for ourselves alone.

“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.”

–Edmund Burke

(This may be the basis for the oft-quoted phrase whose speaker is unknown:

“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)

Five Questions About Money and Politics

 

Money1) How much more influence does a citizen gain who spends a great deal of money on a candidate compared with an average citizen who merely casts a ballot? Can votes be “bought” in the sense of understood favors toward certain policies if one accepts money for a campaign?

2) How much does advertising, which must be paid for with money, influence us? How do we make up our minds to vote for a candidate? Are today’s political ads from both parties kin to Hitler’s “big lie”?  Before World War II, he repeated over and over the falsehood that Jews were responsible for Germany’s economic problems. How about Lenin who said: “A lie told often enough becomes the truth”?

3) What is our proper attitude toward money? Wealthy individuals fund charities and non-profits as well as political campaigns.

4) Has money become the new world government? Does a wealthy tycoon in Russia have more in common with a wealthy tycoon in Switzerland or the United States or Nigeria than with his or her own citizens?

vote clip art5) Has money trumped political parties? Do wealthy individuals have more power to win elections than Democrats or Republicans or other political parties?

Showing Up on Easter

The CrossJesus is crucified, his body taken away.

The religious rulers are satisfied. They’ve won. They’ve handled this challenge to their authority by hinting to the Romans that they could have an insurrection on their hands if they didn’t take care of this peasant leader. Their plan worked well, with the Romans handling matters in their usual efficient way.

The Romans are satisfied, too, with the possible exception of their man, Pilate, who expressed misgivings. He went along, however, understanding that it was in his interest not to upset the ones on whom his job depends, so no problem.

The disciples, all men, have fled, taking refuge in some out-of-the-way bolt hole.

Only a few women stay with Jesus, and they follow to see where his body is taken. They spend the next day, the day of rest, preparing for his burial. He must be taken care of, even if all they can do is carry out a proper burial. They’re only women, and no one pays them much attention.

So they come to the tomb on Sunday morning. They find it empty. They are the first to know and the first to tell. What no one else did, they did. They came. They showed up.

Five Questions About Money and Politics

 

Money1) How much more influence does a citizen gain who spends a great deal of money on a candidate compared with an average citizen who merely casts a ballot? Can votes be “bought” in the sense of understood favors toward certain policies if one accepts money for a campaign?

2) How much does advertising, which must be paid for with money, influence us? How do we make up our minds to vote for a candidate? Are today’s political ads from both parties kin to Hitler’s “big lie”?  Before World War II, he repeated over and over the falsehood that Jews were responsible for Germany’s economic problems. How about Lenin who said: “A lie told often enough becomes the truth”?

3) What is our proper attitude toward money? Wealthy individuals fund charities and non-profits as well as political campaigns.

4) Has money become the new world government? Does a wealthy tycoon in Russia have more in common with a wealthy tycoon in Switzerland or the United States or Nigeria than with his or her own citizens?

vote clip art5) Has money trumped political parties? Do wealthy individuals have more power to win elections than Democrats or Republicans or other political parties?

Showing Up on Easter

 

The CrossJesus is crucified, his body taken away.

The religious rulers are satisfied. They’ve won. They’ve handled this challenge to their authority by hinting to the Romans that they could have an insurrection on their hands if they didn’t take care of this peasant leader. Their plan worked well, with the Romans handling matters in their usual efficient way.

The Romans are satisfied, too, with the possible exception of their man, Pilate, who expressed misgivings. He went along, however, understanding that it was in his interest not to upset the ones on whom his job depends, so no problem.

The disciples, all men, have fled, taking refuge in some out-of-the-way bolt hole.

Only a few women stay with Jesus, and they follow to see where his body is taken. They spend the next day, the day of rest, preparing for his burial. He must be taken care of, even if all they can do is carry out a proper burial. They’re only women, and no one pays them much attention.

So they come to the tomb on Sunday morning. They find it empty. They are the first to know and the first to tell. What no one else did, they did. They came. They showed up.

Dictatorship: New Spring Fashion

 

When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1989, I worked in a small north Georgia town as a historic preservation planner. I watched the world-changing events on television in my cramped historic house, used during the Civil War as a hospital for wounded and dying soldiers.

Touched by the reminders of that war, I rejoiced at this peaceful revolution. Cheering crowds shredded the Iron Curtain as they hammered down the Wall in Berlin and ousted Communist regimes in other eastern European countries.

Saddam HusseinFor the next episode, I was privileged to work closer to the front lines. I was in Saudi Arabia working for the State Department when the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was defeated by the first alliance since World War II that included Russia.

A decade later, terrorism, two wars, and a world-wide recession blunted that optimism. Then it revived with the “Arab spring” that begin in late 2010, leading to the overthrow of several Arab dictators. When the Arab spring froze into what some call the “Arab winter,” pessimism  returned.

So have the dictatorships.

Bachar-al-AssadVladimir Putin in Russia, Bashar al-Assad in Syria, and the generals in Egypt, among others, push against what a short time ago seemed an unstoppable march to self-government.

What happened?

The lack of job growth worldwide played a part, including a major recession. Even more, the growth of tycoon-laced corruption in some of the new nations, especially in Russia, meant that the newly-hatched democracies never learned to fly according to the rules of a civil society. The former Soviet republic, Ukraine, was one such failed hope.

Unfettered capitalism did take root, the kind that flourished in the United States in the Gilded Age. Without a corresponding growth in such institutions as an impartial court system, an accountable police force, and an independent press, the industrial titans gained too much power.

PutinUkraine has recently struggled to return to democracy but it is hampered by the leftovers of a corrupt regime. Russia’s Putin took advantage of the country’s weakness. That is often the way dictators amass power.

Why We Read Coming-of-Age Novels

 

Response spring-2014-coverThe fancy name for coming-of-age stories is Bildungsroman (loosely translated: growth novel). This word is featured in a column by Christine Chaney, a professor of English at Seattle Pacific University, in the 2014 spring issue of Response (SPU) magazine.

According to Dr. Chaney, the early Victorian novel Jane Eyre by Charolotte Bronte is a Bildungsroman. So is the entire Harry Potter series. A single character “often grows from childhood to adulthood, gaining wisdom through life experiences—while often making mistakes and suffering loss along the way.”

I was drawn to the article because I have begun a series which does just that—traces the growth of an Appalachian young man leaving his roots and entering the changing world of the nation’s capital at the end of the twentieth century. The protagonist must travel both geographically and culturally into the digital age. How does he adjust his childhood views within this new world?

All of us are characters in our own growth novel, only our growth does not end when we leave young adulthood.