Tag Archives: Henry Kissinger

Perfection Never Arrives; Better to Look for Wisdom

Waiting for perfection is like the dilemma pictured in Waiting for Godot. Perfection never arrives, like the never–arriving title character in the play.

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger once said, “The insistence on absolutes . . . is a prescription of inaction.”

Waiting for a perfect time to act may mean we miss the best time to act, a time which may never come again. Instead of perfection, better to look for wisdom. Wise leaders who know history can better lead in those imperfect times. Yet, Kissinger complained, we tend to prefer “charismatic leaders over crafty statesmen.”

To prefer charismatic leaders encourages politicians to choose a Hitler, as happened in Germany during the 1930’s. Blaming problems on the threat to a mythical “Aryan” race and espousing a desire for a kind of golden age, led to concentration camps for Jews, confessing Christians, the handicapped, and others considered enemies of this new order.

A perfect leader is a myth. Instead, choose the wisest imperfect leader.

Dancing with the Candidates

We want to fall in love with our candidates, idolize them, and take selfies with them.

Unfortunately, star power has little to do with governing ability.

Henry Kissinger, U.S. Secretary of State under President Richard Nixon, spelled out a cynical view of political candidates: “the typical political leader . . . is a man with a strong will, a high capacity to get himself elected, but no very great conception of what he is going to do when he gets into office.”(quoted by Niall Ferguson, Foreign Affairs, “The Meaning of Kissinger,” September/October 2015).

Can we judge, then, how our candidates will govern if elected? Try asking these questions:

Will they see themselves as public servants, elected to serve the people, not themselves?

Will they appoint men and women of both ability and character to serve under them?

Will they know how to persuade other nations to our policies, even nations who may not like us but whose alliances we need?

How is their character, their staying power, when the chips are down, when the unexpected happens?

Can they stand to be unpopular after the honeymoon ends and a fickle electorate falls out of love with them?