Tag Archives: Embassy Evacuations: a Hazard of the Diplomatic Career

Evacuation

During my orientation to the U.S. Foreign Service, one of the presenters confidently told us that, for sure, given a normal diplomatic career, we’d all be evacuated, due to war or civil turmoil, at least once from the U.S. embassy or consulate where we were assigned.

Actually, I was evacuated twice, upping the odds. Before you have visions of my being airlifted to safety by a U.S. military helicopter, however, I must confess that both were blessedly uneventful.

In Algeria, my tour was curtailed early because of ongoing strife in the country and increasing threats against diplomats and other foreign nationals. I left on a crowded Air Algérie flight to Paris where I enjoyed an afternoon and evening before flying out to Washington the next day.

In Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, terrorist attacks against Americans led to another embassy draw down of embassy personnel. This time I flew out on a crowded flight to Amsterdam and enjoyed an evening in another pleasant European city.

I was quite fortunate. Recent evacuations are more likely to mirror the kind recently carried out in Afghanistan and Sudan. In Sudan, the more recent, American embassy staff were brought to safety by helicopter, as chaos descended on the country.

The evacuations in Sudan followed dangerous battles between two strongmen, each wanting power and apparently too selfish to care about what they were inflicting on the citizens of their country.

Yes, U.S. diplomats are sometimes killed. Their names are inscribed on walls in a lobby of the U.S. State Department in Washington. Fortunately, however, most American and other foreign diplomats usually make it out. Left behind are ordinary men, women, and children facing civil war, including not only physical attacks but also starvation as basic goods run out and cannot be replaced.

The diplomatic world is perhaps chastened again by its helplessness, as its members leave carnage and perhaps memories of local friends and acquaintances who have no U.S. helicopters to bring them to safety.

 

Embassy Evacuations: a Hazard of the Diplomatic Career

Log on to the website for the U.S. embassy in Caracas, Venezuela, and the phrase immediately pops up: “The embassy is only providing emergency services for U.S. citizens . . . ”

Due to the crisis in Venezuela with the Maduro government, most American staff have been withdrawn from the embassy, removing employees and their families from harm’s way.

The possibility of a mission draw down or evacuation is one of the facts of diplomatic life. My two evacuations were easier for me than for some. Both were due to terrorism dangers, but my children were grown and unaffected. My husband’s job wasn’t dependent on where we were living. Within a few weeks, I was assigned to another post.

By contrast, the evacuation within seven days of sixty diplomats and their families from the U.S. embassy in Moscow last year was not due to terrorism, but nevertheless involved many people suddenly pulled out of planned lives. The United States and Russia both ordered large numbers of diplomats from their respective countries over U.S. sanctions against Russia.

Household goods packed out, health and school certificates issued, keys and radios turned in, rabies shots confirmed for pets, and seats on charter flights arranged were only some of the tasks. Children and teenagers had to deal with leaving school terms only eleven weeks before they were to end.

On arrival in Washington, they were met with balloons, welcome home signs, and hugs from former colleagues. Jet-lagged toddlers fell asleep on the floor as their parents attended information meetings.

Evacuated officers began searching for forward assignments. Other families left officers behind who continued to work in Moscow.

Yet as one embassy member wrote: “There is no pretense in the courage of its members, playing the hand they have been dealt with dignity and grace.”

The remaining staff in Moscow stepped up “determined to keep the embassy not just functioning, but moving forward.”

Some who left said it would have been easier “if they had hated Moscow. The truth is,” the article writer said, “we who live here love the city. That is also one of the strengths of the mission. We are moving forward. That is what we do.” (Anne Godfrey, wife of the deputy chief of mission of the U.S. embassy in Moscow, Foreign Service Journal, July-August 2018, “When the Going Gets Tough: Moscow”).