Category Archives: Christians Confronting Global Changes

Christians Confronting Global Change

The Church Forever Decaying and Being Restored

Tom Holland, raised in the Christian tradition, but not, it would appear, a card-carrying Christian today, has written a unique history of Christianity’s journey: Dominion, How the Christian Revolution Remade the World. His book suggests that the main currents working for justice in the world today owe their power to the religion begun by a Jewish rabbi two thousand years ago.

Few today, including devout Christians, would claim a sinless Christianity. Yet the very people, Holland suggests, who malign it may themselves be carriers of the lessons of its founder.

Movements improving the lot of humankind have mostly occurred after Christianity began, and they often were begun by Christians. They include movements against slavery and for improving the status of women and children. They include the building of hospitals and measures to improve the lot of the poor.

Those who call out the sins of some calling themselves Christians—bigotry, support of slavery, and male dominance, to name a few—build on the lessons Jesus taught, also against the sins of religious leaders.

The gospel writer Luke records an incident of someone working in Jesus’ name who didn’t follow with the disciples: “‘Master, we saw someone casting out demons in your name, and we tried to stop him, because he does not follow with us.’ But Jesus said to him, ‘Do not stop him, for whoever is not against you is for you.’” (Luke 9:49-50)

T.S. Eliot wrote in The Rock: “Of all that was done in the past, you eat the fruit, either rotten or ripe.
And the Church must be forever building, and always decaying, and always being restored.”

A Rekindling of Hope?

“. . . new coalitions are gradually forming, across many different kinds of Christians . . . who are rethinking old convictions, who are meeting, and mobilizing in the hopes of renewing the evangelical presence in America.”

So wrote David Brooks in an opinion piece for The New York Times, February 4, 2022: “The Dissenters Trying to Save Evangelicalism From Itself.”

Some would say that the nadir of American evangelicalism was on display in the support of Donald Trump for president by about eighty percent of American evangelicals in 2016. As Brooks pointed out, however, the election only displayed results of years of challenges faced by evangelicals. (Lately, some have questioned how many self-defining “evangelicals” actually are active church members.)

Brooks’ column reported on those evangelical leaders and lay people who are, in fact, appalled by the political decisions of evangelicals in 2020. It spotlighted efforts in opposite directions. “There are now many, many people who refused to be silent about abuses of power.”

This readjustment has resulted in denominational differences becoming less important. “These kinds of new connections constitute an important form of social capital that may turn out to be very powerful in the year ahead.”

American evangelicalism may owe any change in direction in some measure to its changing makeup—more “Korean, African and Hispanic” members, for example.

News stories are full of the decline of American Christianity. Stories of young people leaving the faith of their parents are legion.

But the history of two millennia of Christianity is full of dark nadirs when many calling themselves Christians failed to live up to the teachings of their founder. Yet, renewal always followed, sometimes arriving from the backwaters of civilization.

Perhaps the next renewal of Christianity may come from some combination of non-Western Christianity joining with a remnant of American evangelicals.

Where the Light Fell

When the author Philip Yancey was a baby, his father contracted polio and died. Today, few Americans give thought to that horrible disease, arriving without any seeming purpose, crippling some, killing others.

Yancey doesn’t remember his father’s death. He only learned as a young man of his parents’ decision to remove his father from the hospital and its life saving equipment “against medical advice.” The couple had planned to be missionaries. They believed God would heal Yancey’s father so the couple could carry out what they believed to be their mission.

When the father died instead, Yancey’s mother dealt with this crisis of faith by offering up her two sons to be missionaries in the couple’s place. Yancey comes to realize: “My brother and I are the atonement to compensate for a fatal error in belief.”

Yancey’s book is the story of the sons’ journeys through this awful blood sacrifice. His brother, a talented young man, chose a devastating route out of the destiny his mother planned for him.

Yancey also fought against the legalistic straight jacket placed on him by his mother and some of the churches and colleges he attended. He began his own study of books and writings that opened both his mind and his spirit. He fell in love and knew a joy he had never known before.

Unexpectedly, in a college prayer meeting, he opens up and actually prays—at first defiantly against a God he doesn’t care for—but something happens. His honest prayer begins what is perhaps his first true experience of God’s grace.

Yancey’s story (Where the Light Fell) and his other writings bridge the gap felt by many who struggle within legalistic churches that too often have failed to understand what Jesus lived and taught.

 

Culture and the Christian Faith

The Christian faith, over time, has refused to be bound by one culture. Beginning in the Middle East through a few Jewish followers, it broke the bounds of those who wanted it tied only to that nationality.

It refused to be bound by Greek speakers, spreading to the western Roman empire. When the new religion of Islam devastated Christian empires in the east, it grew in Europe.

Eventually, it burst the bounds of church/state unions in Europe. Kings tried to own it, but segments broke away from a church/state identity and spread, especially in the New World. Amazingly, Christianity began to grow in a new arena that refused any ties to state domination.

Over the centuries, Christianity keeps discovering new areas of growth: against slavery and racism and worship of money. Against nationalism.

Christians still struggle not to be dominated by outside interests: class, wealth, politics, power. In the United States, a too-close identification with American culture has led to declines in some groups.

But one of the faith’s strengths is that defeat leads it to find new arenas for growth.

Decline of Religion

According to one academic study, religious practice in the world appears to be declining:

“From about 2007 to 2019, the overwhelming majority of the countries we studied—43 out of 49—became less religious. The decline in belief was not confined to high-income countries and appeared across most of the world.” (Ronald F. Inglehart, University of Michigan, “Giving up on God; the Global Decline of Religion,” Foreign Affairs, September/October 2020)

A previous study analyzing 49 countries from 1981-2007 had found that 33 of the 49 countries had become more religious. The 33 countries included most former communist countries, most developing countries, and even a few high income countries.

The more recent study, however, showed that religion was practiced less even in many lower income countries.

Inglehart concluded: “Modern societies have become less religious in part because they no longer need to uphold the kinds of gender and sexual norms that the major world religions have instilled for centuries.”

What is interesting for me, however, in a personal look into Christianity’s place in the world today, is how it is, this moment, continuing its tradition of breaking new barriers.

In times past, religion in western societies usually revolved around families and communities. Schools, politics, and other forms of civic life tended to uphold norms held by the majority. Religion included a kind of civil religion, generally Christian or Jewish.

Mass migration of young people away from birth communities as well as modern inventions like social media have played havoc with community norms. The multi-generational family long ago gave way to the nuclear family which gave way to young people setting up single person households or with a significant other. Religion as encouraged by family suffered greatly.

Now, however, a next generation Christianity is proving that Christianity is not dead but evolving, perhaps closer to the model lived by Jesus.

A minority, but a significant minority, are espousing issues like racial reconciliation and care for the struggling—the homeless, the mentally ill, and the migrant, to name a few.

From the time the disciple Peter struggled to accept Gentiles into the Jewish Christian community, Christians have broken bounds, sometimes willingly, sometimes after fallow periods—but the conquest first named in a letter from the missionary preacher Paul continues today: “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you all one in Christ Jesus.”

Greater America

The United States is fortunate in that the potential immigrants into our country on our southern border are from populations with whom we have known and interacted for centuries. Unlike other migration movements in the world, our cultures share many similarities.

The United States has not always proved helpful to Central Americans. In the past, we have supported dictatorships friendly to corporate interests taking advantage of poorly paid workers.

We can atone for some of those sins by pushing for reform by those Central American governments whose corruption we have often overlooked.

In an effort to deal with increased flows of migrants toward our borders, President Joe Biden has begun meetings with our Central American neighbors at various levels to develop programs around issues that connect us. These include migration but also economic development and climate change. Dealing with these issues might reduce the northward flow of immigrants.

Of course, this flow into our country is not necessarily bad. One of these days, we may look back with envy on those movements sending us the immigrants we needed for our birth-deficient nation.

Livestreaming Violence: Our Choice

Jacinda Ardern, New Zealand’s prime minister, has called for a global meeting to discuss measures to stop the livestreaming of violence. It’s set for this week in Paris. Ardern is co-chairing the Paris meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron.

New Zealand recently was the scene of another horrific mass murder, this time of Muslims. This massacre was planned by the killers to be beamed to the world on social media as they carried it out.

In the world of instantaneous broadcasts, the massacre was viewed, as the killers intended, millions of times. Social media sites attempted to shut it down, but humans can act only so fast—not nearly as fast as the internet.

It’s a safe bet that virtually everybody who downloaded that video did so by choice.
Whatever the legal changes, or lack of, to the practice of livestreaming, people watch such scenes by choice.

An unwatched video loses its power. Ultimately, it’s our choice to watch or not.